Regional scale modeling of surface and ground water interaction in the Snake River basin1
ABSTRACT: Changes in irrigation and land use may impact discharge of the Snake River Plain aquifer, which is a major contributor to flow of the Snake River in southern Idaho. The Snake River Basin planning and management model (SRBM) has been expanded to include the spatial distribution and temporal attenuation that occurs as aquifer stresses propagate through the aquifer to the river. The SRBM is a network flow model in which aquifer characteristics have been introduced through a matrix of response functions. The response functions were determined by independently simulating the effect of a unit stress in each cell of a finite difference groundwater flow model on six reaches of the Snake River. Cells were aggregated into 20 aquifer zones and average response functions for each river reach were included in the SRBM. This approach links many of the capabilities of surface and ground water flow models. Evaluation of an artificial recharge scenario approximately reproduced estimates made by direct simulation in a ground water flow model. The example demonstrated that the method can produce reasonable results but interpretation of the results can be biased if the simulation period is not of adequate duration.
Surface water and ground water systems are often intimately connected. Industrial, commercial, and agricultural land uses impact aquifer recharge and discharge, which in turn impact spring discharge to, and seepage from, surface water bodies. Irrigated agriculture is a significant component of river and aquifer water budgets in many areas of the western United States. Surface water applied in excess of crop consumptive requirements enters the ground water system increasing aquifer water levels and spring discharge. Ground water pumping for irrigation or other consumptive uses creates the opposite effect. The Snake River in southern Idaho is a prime example of a surface water system that is greatly affected by ground water conditions that change in response to irrigation practices.
As the Snake River passes through south central Idaho, greater than 50 percent of the annual flow is derived from spring discharge. As a result of incidental recharge from surface water irrigation, spring discharge along the Thousand Springs reach of the Snake River increased from approximately 85 m^sup 3^/s in the 1930s to over 180 m^sup 3^/s by the 1950s (Kjelstrom, 1995). With the introduction of more efficient irrigation methods and a transition from surface water to ground water irrigation sources, spring discharges began to decline, directly impacting base flow of the Snake River. The resulting lower base flows come at a time when instream and offstream water demands are growing and diversifying.
The flow of the Snake River is the object of many competing demands. Historically, river flows and reservoirs were managed primarily for irrigation. Demands associated with hydroelectric power, recreation, and fish and wildlife needs were generally of secondary concern. Federal and state policies, in response to changing values and public sentiment, have placed higher values on maintaining fish and wildlife habitat, species protection, and recreation. Additionally, the recent increases in the value of electrical power have stimulated a stronger competition for the resource by the hydropower industry. This change in values is placing the traditional irrigation demands in direct competition with nontraditional demands. Federal and state management agencies are attempting to adjust to changing values while maintaining most, if not all, of the traditional demands.